Google harms users by favoring its own services in search results, study find

Courtesy:  PCWORLD.com
Loek Essers,  IDG News Service

Google’s favoring of its own services in search results doesn’t just harm competitors, it also harms consumers, according to research sponsored by a complainant in the EU antitrust trial against the company.

The study found that users are 45 percent more likely to click on search results organically generated by Google’s own search engine than on results in which Google favors its own services, as it does now.

“This suggests that by leveraging dominance in search to promote its internal content, Google is reducing social welfare—leaving consumers with lower quality results and worse matches,” the researchers found. The study “provides empirical evidence” that Google favoring its own products in some cases harms Google’s users.

“Such conduct therefore cannot be described as pro­competitive,” said Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School, and Michael Luca, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School.

Their study was financially supported by Yelp, a site that allows users to review local businesses and one of the complainants fuelling the European Commission’s antitrust investigation into Google’s search practices. Yelp’s data science team also contributed to the research.

Yelp presented the study during the Antitrust Enforcement Symposium held over the weekend at the University of Oxford in the U.K., a spokeswoman for the university said, and also sent it to the European Commission on Friday. The Commission declined to comment on the study.

The researchers based their findings on click-surveys of 2,690 users who took part in comparative tests of search result presentation. They showed two versions of search results for local business searches, which according to the study represent roughly one-third of desktop search volume and over one-half of mobile search.

For local search results, Google currently typically shows a list of seven business pins populated by results from Google’s specialized search services such as Google+ Local and travel in relation to a map, the researchers said. Google calls such blending of results from its own specialized search engines into general search results “universal search.”

In the researchers’ alternative version, a browser plug-in was used to display a map and a list of search results based on Google’s own organic algorithm, including links from third-party review sites such as Yelp and TripAdvisor.

The test was meant to determine which version delivered the most relevant information for the content in question. It revealed that 32 percent of users would click on Google’s current local results while 47 percent clicked on the alternative search results. This nearly 50 percent increase in click-through rate is an immense difference in the modern Web industry, the researchers said.

“Google appears to be strategically deploying universal search in a way that degrades the product so as to slow and exclude challengers to its dominant search paradigm,” the researchers said.

It’s not all bad, though: There are some instances, such as displaying time or presenting a calculator, where Google favoring its own services does not harm consumers, they found, adding that presenting a calculator on top of a search result page is preferred by users.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has always denied that it violates European antitrust rules.

The Commission opened its antitrust investigation into Google’s search practices in 2010, triggered by complaints from competitors. Google was formally charged with abusing its dominant market position as a search provider in April. The Commission said Google violates European antitrust rules by systematically favoring its own comparison shopping product over competing services, a practice that hurts consumers and stifles competition.

A redacted version of the charges was sent to Google’s foes earlier this month; they were given four weeks to respond. Meanwhile, Google has still to respond to the Commission’s charges.

Meanwhile, the Commission has also started an investigation into Google’s bundling of its apps with the Android OS.

source: 
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2941732/google-harms-consumers-by-favoring-its-own-services-study-finds.html

Facebook Disrupting YouTube & Tweeting Potholes

Courtesy: L2Inc
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI6iJByFu6o

Published on Jun 18, 2015
This week’s winners: Facebook and LinkedIn. Facebook looks set to disrupt YouTube as mobile video continues its upward trajectory. Video traffic has exploded on Facebook, which now receives three-quarters of its quarterly ad revenue from mobile advertising — up from zero 30 months ago. This will go down as the greatest pivot in corporate history.

The Web is getting slower

Courtesy: 
CNNMoney (New York) June 16, 2015

The average site is now 2.1 MB in size -- two times larger than the average site from three years ago, according to data tracked by HTTP Archive.

There are a few reasons for this added weight.

Websites are adding more attention-attracting videos, images, interactivity plug-ins (comments and feeds) and other code and script-heavy features that clog up broadband pipes and wireless spectrum.

Sites also have ramped up their usage of tracking and analysis tools to learn more about their visitors. Inserting third-party data trackers not only increases a website's weight, but also the number of separate data fetching tasks, which leads to slower load times as well.

Photos and videos continue to be the bulkiest part of websites, making up almost three-fourths their size. That proportion has stayed relatively constant over the past three years, even as the total size of websites has grown.

But as more smartphones, tablets, watches and other gizmos are built to go online, developers have to create even more versions of websites and Web components to fit evermore formats. Some websites, for example, have more than 50 different image sizes which can be called upon to load depending on device. This additional complexity requires more code to run, and adds to a website's bulk.

"The shift from desktop to mobile requests and consumption have had the biggest impact on website performance," said Craig Adams, VP of Web experience products at Akamai, a content delivery network that services 15% to 30% of all online traffic daily.

On top of all this, websites are using stronger encryption to make themselves more secure. Shielding themselves behind secured protocols requires more code and data crunching power, too.

The component that has grown the most in size, surprisingly, is custom fonts. Developers are creating unique fonts to differentiate themselves from everyone else online. Three years ago, font transfer size was less than 1% of a webpage's weight, and now the proportion is up to 5%.

There are a variety of other factors that lead to a slower browsing experience, such as network congestion, processing power, browser type, and the number of other programs and tabs you have open.

But all things being equal, the Web is slowing down. It's only slowing by a matter of seconds, but literally every millisecond counts. The slower a Web page loads the more likely it is we'll leave for a competitor's site.

Source: http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/16/technology/web-slow-big/index.html

Here's how the Siri of iOS 9 will push ahead of Google Now and Cortana

Courtesy: Mark Hachman | @markhachman
Senior Editor, PCWorld

When Siri arrives as part of iOS 9 this fall, it'll be with new features that should make Google Now and Cortana take notice. Here are the standouts, from Spotlight to deeper app integration and more.

For years, Apple’s Siri digital assistant has skulked in the corner of iOS, usually assisting only when asked. Like the wallflower who gets a summer makeover, however, the new Siri that steps out with iOS 9 this fall will be outgoing and eager, bounding forward to help. 

Siri’s upgrade (revealed at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday) emphasizes proactivity and has achieved parity with the primary features of Google Now and Microsoft’s Cortana: time- and location-based reminders, hunting down videos that can be played within an app, identifying contacts via their phone number, or launching particular songs. But several of Siri’s promised features actually push the platform ahead of the competition: pulling useful data from your apps, controlling your smart home, and kicking off specialized tasks based on your habits or current needs.

Now that the power balance is shifting, here’s how Siri stacks up to her competition.

Tracking your health, thoughtfully
Most health apps are by definition somewhat passive. For example, Microsoft’s Windows Phone Bing Health and Fitness app tracks your exercise, and assesses how far you’ve traveled and how many calories you’ve burned. Ditto for specialized apps that run on top of Android. But none of them, to my knowledge, allow you to dictate a run that’s defined by the number of calories you want to burn—such as asking Siri to oversee a “300-calorie bike ride.” I can’t help but think fitness fiends will love that one.

Using app data to refine suggestions

The expanded iOS 9 Spotlight search also takes contextual awareness to a new level. By swiping left on the iOS home screen, you can bring up relevant search information—which in iOS 9, means relevant apps, contacts, even nearby locations. It’s the sort of feature that Android launchers like Aviate have attempted, using its knowledge that you’re out and about, for example, to suggest using apps like Foursquare or Yelp. Likewise, the new version of Siri promises to tap into the knowledge you’ve added to those apps. It’s the difference between asking “Where is Harry’s Chinese restaurant?” and “Where’s that Chinese restaurant I like?”

What’s less clear is how much control Siri will have over those apps. In his demonstration, Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering, implied that Siri would understand you were entering the gym at a certain time, and it would have a bouncy mix of exercise music ready when you plugged in your headphones. 

Taken a bit further, Siri could even automatically launch the Target app, for example, if you used the phone at the store, or launch Apple Pay when you approached the register. That seems like a lot to hope for in iOS 9, so we’ll see.

Siri’s big ideas vs. Google Now’s discrete tasks

Android fans will eye the new Siri with particular interest, given the compelling advantage of Google Now’s contextual features. Siri both exceeds and falls short of Google Now’s capabilities. The primary difference, however, is in the interface.

Google Now relies on a series of discrete “cards,” each containing a modular piece of information: the upcoming weather forecast, for example. Siri can pop up a reminder for you to leave to reach your next appointment on time, but Siri seems more integrated into the OS and apps themselves rather than as a separate interface. In Windows Phone, Cortana is a dedicated app. No one approach really stands out as superior.

What Google Now does best is supply all the little details that Siri has traditionally ignored: Where’d I park? When does that next bus arrive? When is my water bill due? A handy task-oriented interface lets you to flick cards off the screen into oblivion once you’re done with them. Google Now can also use internal app data to provide a list of Airbnb rentals in Lake Tahoe for this coming weekend, and it appears Siri will be able to do the same.

The upcoming Siri appears to have taken a more focused approach, though. For instance, you can order Google Now to play a particular playlist, or a song by a particular artist. But asking Siri to play the “top song of 1989” will launch that specific song, while Google returns a list of search results. (I’d expect that feature to be matched by Google before iOS 9 launches). 

The new, proactive Siri will know what you’re referring to without having to be explicitly told—or at least it did on the particular email used in Apple’s demo. Google’s getting there, too: At the company’s own recent developer conference, I/O, it showed a similar Now on Tap feature due to ship with its Android M mobile operating system. 

Siri will assist without being intrusive

Last but certainly not least, there’s privacy. Google’s grubby paws grab as much of your data as it can get, and makes no bones about it. Cortana also digs through your personal info.

Apple says it won’t tie any queries it makes on your behalf to your Apple ID, and any email mining will take place on your machine, not the cloud. That may be a convenient way to avoid stressing Apple’s cloud further, but it’s also going to appeal to average consumers and techies alike who worry about how much of their life is being compiled into a digital dossier. 

Cortana who? 

So you noticed Cortana hasn’t come up much. Call it a good digital assistant trapped in a platform that still needs to prove itself. Microsoft would probably argue that it has one advantage over Google and Apple: a unified OS—Windows 10—that ties together embedded devices, phones, tablets, notebooks, desktops, and even massive wall-sized screens, not to mention Microsoft’s upcoming Edge browser. 

Apple reserves Siri for its phones, tablets and watches, although notifications can make their way into Mac OS. (Some of us thought that Siri integration into Mac OS X would be a no-brainer.) Google sort of straddles the two, allowing users to trigger Google Now via their desktop Chrome browser.

Cortana has missed some big opportunities, though. When Google bought Nest, some scratched their heads: What’s Google doing here? Since Apple introduced its own  HomeKit platform, however, the way forward’s been clearer—and Microsoft has no real answer to that, nor to the smartphone-car connectivity of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. (Microsoft has announced a partnership with Insteon, however.)

We all know about Microsoft’s app gap, but even worse, Microsoft hasn’t revealed any way to tap the knowledge you’ve added to those apps to match the capabilities being built into Google Now and Siri. 

For now, Microsoft uses a separate OS to power the Microsoft Band, and the company lacks the breadth of hardware that both Apple and Google do. Let’s see what Cortana can do on the Xbox One, however, before we rule out Microsoft entirely. 

I really like Cortana. I use it every day, alongside Google Now (and, less frequently, Siri). But here’s the bottom line: A year ago, the battle between the three digital assistants was waged primarily on the accuracy of answers they provided to spoken queries. Now, we’re going to have to evaluate them based on how well they perform behind the scenes, managing your digital life without supervision.

Source:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2932607/heres-how-the-siri-of-ios-9-will-push-ahead-of-google-now-and-cortana.html

Apple is getting smarter with search and keeping its users away from Google

Source: 
WRITTEN BY Mike Murphy
QUARTZ

At its annual Worldwide Developers Conference yesterday, Apple announced updated versions of its mobile and desktop operating systems, including a focus on search, powered by its Siri “assistant” technology.

Apple is moving search closer to how we actually think—the stream of consciousness of errant thoughts and things that we want to know right this second, regardless of what device we’re on, or where we are—rather than having to fire up a web browser and manually conduct a Google keyword search.

Google’s search dominance is arguably nearing its peak, and instead of fighting head on, Apple seems to be more interested in giving people access to information as soon as they want it. In other words, stepping between its users and Google.

Natural search on desktop

Apple has refined its Spotlight search engine for years, and now OS X will pull in information from a range of new sources beyond what’s on the computer. By pressing command-spacebar, Mac users will be able to get sports scores, directions, weather, and transit information, along with other snippets of information.

(Apple)

But Apple’s doing more than just bringing Siri to the desktop: Users can now search in their own words. If you want to see what you were working on last week, just type “Documents I worked on last week” into a Mac search bar, and the OS will pull them up. As Apple says on itspreview page: “When you’re looking for something, just type it the way you’d say it.”

This function—which sounds a lot like the “natural language” search found in Facebook’s Graph Search—will be available in seven languages at launch. Being able to type what you’re thinking, how you’re thinking it, right into Spotlight without the need for a search page is almost certainly a shot across Google’s bow.

Siri is all over mobile

With iOS 9, Apple has given Siri the ability to take things into context, including apps on your phone. You can ask her to start playing a specific song, or to remind you to finish up an email you’re working on later in the day. Search results increasingly jump right into iOS apps. This means a user could search for a recipe on Spotlight and be pulled right into the pertinent information in a cooking app, without ever having to open a web browser or use a Google service.

Apple’s Craig Federighi is very interested in potatoes.(Apple)

Siri is also powering a new Spotlight search screen on iOS devices, meaning everything Siri can find, you can now access from the homescreen. This screen is also going to be pre-filled with contextual suggested information—contacts you might want to call, traffic conditions, apps you might be thinking of opening, and even news articles that you might be interested in—based on how, when, and where you use your phone.

Apple isn’t the only one thinking outside the search page. Googleannounced an update to its digital assistant at its own developer conference last month, where search becomes an almost passive activity. For example: If you get a text about a restaurant, you can hit the home button, and Google Now will serve you up an information card about the restaurant. It’s a behavior that Google would love to get its Android users hooked on.

Bigger picture, Apple and Google are both pushing toward a future where we don’t need plain-old web search engines. The key difference: Apple’s core business—selling iPhones and Macs—is less tied to serving advertisements on search pages than Google’s, which generated 68% of its revenue last year from ads on its own websites.

Source:
http://qz.com/422998/apple-is-getting-smarter-with-search-and-keeping-its-users-away-from-google/

Google removes Google+ account links in Gmail, search results

Courtesy: Jordan Novet
Venturebeat.com

Google has removed prominent links to Google+ accounts at the top of search results, Google’s homepage, and Gmail, according to a new report today. The change suggests the tech giant is doing still more to gradually phase out its social network.

You can still find a link to your Google+ account by clicking the grid icon to bring up a bunch of Google apps, as 9to5Google mentioned in its report on the change today.

Google has been taking steps in the past few months to optimize Google+. Google quietly removed the Google+ Shared Collections featureannounced the new Collections feature, and basically split up Google+ into separate products, Photos and Streams. Last week Google Photos, a service based on the photo component of Google+, officially launched.

Executives specifically described Google Photos as a standalone product that was not part of Google+. That’s an attempt to distance the new service from Google+, which launched in 2011 and is considered less of a success for Google than other social networks, like Facebook and Twitter.

Last week, I ran into Sundar Pichai, Google’s senior vice president for Android, Chrome, and Apps, and I asked him what would be happening to Google+. He responded by saying, “We are working on it. … You will hear more about it later this year.”

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


SOURCE:
http://venturebeat.com/2015/06/01/google-removes-google-account-links-in-gmail-search-results/?utm_content=bufferf078e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Who is the Fifth Horseman?

Courtesy: L2Inc.
By Homa Zaryouni | 12 May 2015, Scott Galloway

Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google are the four horsemen, companies who are collectively the size of Lexington, Kentucky and have the GDP of Australia. Can any other company join their ranks? In this video from DLD NYC, Scott Galloway discusses the contenders for the fifth horseman position and ranks their likelihood to join the top tier based on an eight-piece algorithm.

The fifth horseman must have a differentiated product, cheap access to capital, a global consumer-base, a maternal attitude towards employees, inventory control through vertical distribution, knowledge consumer identities, a strong brand used as a vanity play and technical literacy. Seven companies (Uber, Alibaba, Starbucks, Linkedin, Tesla, Nike, and Walmart) come close, but none have demonstrated all of the above characteristics. Walmart, Linkedin, and Alibaba don’t have a brand people want to associate with. Starbucks spends more on its employees than on coffee beans, but does not have access to cheap capital. Tesla has a finite consumer base rather than a global one. And although Nike is a prestigious global brand and a fantastic place to work, its product is not all that differentiated from competitors.

Uber was the closest brand to the four horsemen. One million people ride the service every day, which is more than the Chicago CTA or Boston T. At 162,000 drivers, Uber’s employee base is triple that of Delta Airlines. So where does Uber lag in the algorithm? It does not have a maternal attitude towards employees, as it has access to the cheapest source of on-demand labor without unions or health insurance. While that is good for users and the company, Scott Galloway questions its benefits for society.

source: https://www.l2inc.com/fifth-horseman/2015/blog

Google Photos ditches Google+ to avoid the creepy factor

Courtesy:
By Blair Hanley Frank, IDG News Service\San Francisco bureau

If there’s one word that summarizes why Google’s new photo service works separately from Google+, it’s “privacy.”

The company wanted Photos to be a “private, sacred, secure place for all of [its users’] memories, without agenda,” Bradley Horowitz, Google’s vice president of streams and photos, said during a press conference at Google I/O Thursday.

That’s not aligned with the current mission for Google+, which has gone from a social network aimed at taking on Facebook to what Horowitz calls a home for “people who want to connect together around their interests and passions.”

Google Photos offers free, unlimited photo and video storage in Google’s cloud, along with tools that organize the media and make them easier to share.

The photo capabilities in Google+ were among its most touted features, thanks to the image enhancement technology provided by Google’s acquisition of Snapseed and the company’s generous 15GB of free storage. But as it turns out, it’s hard to get people to upload all of their private photos to a social network, even if their settings will keep those images from prying eyes.

According to Google Photos Product Lead Anil Sabharwal, the desire for privacy was a “primary driver” behind keeping Google Photos separate from Google+. That’s why the service’s facial recognition tools don’t share what they learn about images across different users. Each user will have their database of faces kept to themselves.

Before people get too worried about their images being used to power Google’s advertisements, Sabharwal said that the company isn’t planning to monetize the free version of Photos with ads or in any other way.

Google Photos still holds an echo of Google+. The service will automatically import all of the images someone has posted to the social network (along with their Google Drive account) to populate its storage. In addition, users can sign up for a second storage tier beyond the service’s unlimited free tier.

Users can upload as many images as they want up to 16 megapixels in size, or videos in up to 1080p resolution, but Google won’t guarantee that their memories will be kept in tip top condition or allow users to store them in a format of their choice, such as TIFF or RAW. Those users who want more control and better assurances about their images’ safety can take advantage of the 15GB of free storage between their Google Drive, Google+ and Gmail accounts, and then purchase an extra terabyte of storage for $10 a month.

In the event users want to get all of their photos out of the service, they’ll be able to download them through Google Takeout, though the images won’t retain any of the categorization data from Photos.